Understanding the Brain

Assertive community treatment

From Cognopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Assertive community treatment, or ACT, is an intensive and highly integrated approach for community mental health service delivery.[1] ACT programs serve people whose symptoms of mental illness result in severe functional difficulties that interfere with their ability to achieve personally meaningful recovery goals in several major areas of life: working, having friends, living independently, and so forth.


The defining characteristics of ACT include:

  • a clear focus on those participants (clients) who require the most help from the service delivery system;
  • an explicit mission to promote the participants' independence, rehabilitation, and recovery, and in so doing to prevent homelessness and unnecessary hospitalization;
  • an emphasis on home visits and other in vivo (out-of-the-office) interventions, eliminating the need to transfer learned behaviors from an artificial rehabilitation or treatment setting to the "real world";[2]
  • a participant-to-staff ratio that is low enough to allow the ACT "core services team" to perform virtually all of the necessary rehabilitation, treatment, and community support tasks themselves in a coordinated and efficient manner—unlike traditional case managers, who broker or "farm out" most of the work to other professionals;
  • a "total team approach" in which all of the staff work with all of the participants, under the supervision of a qualified mental health professional who serves as the team's leader;
  • an interdisciplinary assessment and service planning process that typically involves a psychiatrist and one or more nurses, occupational therapists, social workers, substance abuse specialists, vocational rehabilitation specialists, and certified peer specialists (individuals who have had personal, successful experience with the recovery process);
  • a willingness on the part of the team to take ultimate professional responsibility for the participants' well-being in all areas of community functioning, including most especially the "nitty-gritty" aspects of everyday life;
  • a conscious effort to help people avoid crisis situations in the first place or, if that proves impossible, to intervene at any time of the day or night to keep crises from turning into unnecessary hospitalizations; and
  • a promise to work with people on a time-unlimited basis, as long as they demonstrate a continuing need for this highly intensive and integrated form of professional help.[3][4][5][6][7]

In the array of standard mental health service types, ACT is considered a "medically monitored non-residential service" (Level 4), making it more intensive than "high intensity community based services" (Level 3) but less intensive than "medically monitored residential services" (Level 5) on the widely accepted LOCUS utilization management instrument.[8]

Early developments

ACT was first developed during the early 1970s—the heyday of deinstitutionalization, when large numbers of patients were being discharged from state-operated psychiatric hospitals to an underdeveloped, poorly integrated "nonsystem" of community services characterized by serious "gaps" and "cracks."[9] The founders of the approach were Leonard I. Stein, M.D.,[10][11][12][13][14][15] Mary Ann Test, Ph.D.,[2][9][16][17][18][19][20][21] Arnold J. Marx, M.D.,[22] Deborah J. Allness, M.S.W.,[4][23] William H. Knoedler, M.D.,[4][24][25][26] and their colleagues[27][28][29][30][31] at the Mendota Mental Health Institute, a state hospital in Madison, Wisconsin.[32] Also known in the literature as the Training in Community Living (TCL) project, the Program of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT), or simply the "Madison model," this innovation seemed radical at the time but has since evolved into one of the most influential service delivery approaches in the history of community mental health.[33] The original Madison project received the American Psychiatric Association's prestigious Gold Award in 1974.[34] After conceiving the model as a strategy to prevent hospitalization in a relatively heterogeneous group of prospective state hospital patients, the PACT team turned its attention in the early 1980s to a more narrowly defined group of young adults with early-stage schizophrenia.[35]

Dissemination of ACT

Since the late 1970s, the ACT approach has been replicated or adapted widely.[36] The Harbinger program in Grand Rapids, Michigan,[37] is generally recognized as the first replication,[38][39] and a family-initiated adaptation in Minnesota also traces its origins to the Madison model.[40] In 1978, the Bridge program[5][41][42][43][44] at the Thresholds[45] psychosocial rehabilitation center in Chicago, Illinois, became the first big-city adaptation of ACT and the first program to focus on the most frequently hospitalized portion of the mental health consumer population.[46] In the 1980s and '90s, Thresholds further adapted the approach to serve deaf people with mental illness,[47] homeless people with mental illness,[48] people experiencing psychiatric crises,[49] and people with mental illness who had been inappropriately jailed.[50] In British Columbia, an experimental assertive outreach program based on the Thresholds model was established in 1988[51] and later expanded to additional sites. Outside of North America, one of the first research-based adaptations was an assertive outreach program in Australia.[52][53][54]

Other replications or adaptations of the ACT approach can be found throughout the English-speaking world. In Wisconsin, the original Madison model was adapted by its founders for the realities of a sparsely populated rural environment.[55][56] The Veterans Health Administration has adapted the ACT model for use at multiple sites throughout the United States.[57] There are also major program concentrations in Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois,[42][45] Indiana (home of numerous research-based ACT programs[58][59] and the Indiana ACT Center[60]), Michigan (home of approximately 100 teams[61][62] and a professional organization called the Assertive Community Treatment Association[63]), Minnesota,[64] Missouri (home of an exemplary program for homeless people with co-occurring mental illness and chemical dependence[65][66][67]), New Jersey, New Mexico, New York,[68] North Carolina, Ohio, Rhode Island, South Carolina,[69][70] South Dakota, Texas, Virginia, Australia,[52][53] Canada,[71][72][73] and the United Kingdom,[74][75][76] among other places.

Although most of the early PACT replicates and adaptations were funded by grants from federal, state/provincial, or local mental health authorities, there has been a growing tendency to fund these services through Medicaid[70] and other publicly supported health insurance plans. Medicaid funding has been used for ACT services throughout the United States, starting in the late 1980s, when Allness left PACT to head Wisconsin's state mental health agency and led the development of ACT operational standards. Since then, U.S. and Canadian standards have been developed, and many states and provinces have used them in the development of ACT services for individuals with psychiatric disabilities who would otherwise be dependent on more costly, less effective alternatives.[77] Although Medicaid has turned out to be a mixed blessing—it can be difficult to demonstrate a person's eligibility for this insurance program or to find supplemental funding for necessary services that it will not cover—Medicaid reimbursement has led to a long-overdue expansion of ACT in previously unserved or underserved jurisdictions.[64]

System planners have attempted to resolve the implementation problems associated with replicating the original Madison approach in sparsely populated rural areas or with low-incidence special populations in urban areas.[78] A related issue for planners is to determine the number of ACT or "ACT-like" programs a particular geographical area needs and can support.[79] Some promising areas for further development are identified in the section below on "Future of ACT."

Research on ACT

ACT and its variations are among the most widely and intensively studied intervention approaches in community mental health.[80] The original Madison studies by Stein and Test and their colleagues are classics in the field.[10][11][12][13][22][81][82] Another major contributor to the ACT literature has been Gary Bond, Ph.D., who completed several studies at Thresholds in Chicago[49][83][84][85][86] and later developed a major psychiatric rehabilitation research program at Indiana University-Purdue University at Indianapolis. Bond has been particularly influential in the development of fidelity measurement scales for ACT[87][88][89][90][91] and other evidence-based practices.[92][93][94] He and his colleagues (especially Robert E. Drake, M.D., Ph.D.,[95][96][97][98][99] at Dartmouth Medical School) have attempted to consolidate and harmonize several major currents in this continuously developing area of practice, including:

  • the different "styles" of service delivery exemplified by PACT in Madison, Thresholds in Chicago, the Dartmouth/New Hampshire model of integrated dual disorders treatment,[100] and other influential programs;
  • the various modifications of the original ACT approach over the years to maximize its effectiveness with particular service delivery challenges, such as helping consumers to recover from co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders[101] or to obtain and retain competitive jobs through a rehabilitation approach called supported employment;[102] and
  • the increasingly well-organized efforts to help consumers take charge of their own illness management and recovery processes.[103][104]

ACT as an evidence-based practice

Because of its long track record of success with high-priority service recipients in a wide variety of geographical and organizational settings—as demonstrated by a large and growing body of rigorous outcome evaluation studies[105][106] -- ACT has been recognized by the United States federal government's Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA),[107][108] the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation,[109] the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI),[110] and the Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities (CARF),[111] among other recognized arbiters, as an evidence-based practice[112][113] worthy of widespread dissemination.

Some critics, notably Tomi Gomory, Ph.D., at Florida State University[114][115] have argued that ACT is inherently coercive and that the research claiming to support it is scientifically invalid; Test and Stein have replied to this critique,[116] and Gomory, in turn, has answered their reply.[117] Moser and Bond address coercion and the broader concept of "agency control" in a discussion of data from 23 ACT programs.[118]

Future of ACT

The cost-effectiveness of ACT was relatively easy to demonstrate in the early days, when psychiatric hospital beds were more heavily used than they are now.[119] In the years to come, ACT programs will have to continue justifying their comparatively high cost through the use of careful admission criteria and rigorous outcome evaluation. The defining characteristics of the ACT approach continue to be an attractive framework for services to meet the needs of special populations, such as individuals whose psychiatric symptoms get them into trouble with the criminal justice system,[120][121][122][123][124] immigrants from foreign countries who also struggle with serious mental illnesses,[125] and children and adolescents with serious emotional disturbances.[126] One critical piece of unfinished business in the mental health field is the discovery that people with serious mental illnesses are dying, on the average, 25 years earlier than the general public—often from disorders that are inherently preventable or treatable—and this public health disaster is a critical issue for ACT providers and the people they serve.[127][128][129] Another important area for future program design and evaluation work is the use of ACT in concert with other established interventions, such as integrated dual disorders treatment,[101] supported employment,[70][102] family psychoeducation approaches for concerned relatives,[130][131] and dialectical behavior therapy for persons with borderline personality disorder.[132][133][134] Ironically, the dissemination of separate evidence-based practices, not all of which are easily integrated with each other, has once again made service coordination a serious issue in community mental health—as it was during the latter part of the 20th century, when ACT was born.[9]

See also


  1. Dixon, L. (2000). Assertive community treatment: Twenty-five years of gold. Psychiatric Services, 51, 759-765.
  2. 2.0 2.1 Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1976). Practical guidelines for the community treatment of markedly impaired patients. Community Mental Health Journal, 12, 72-82.
  3. For a definitive analysis of the essential components of the ACT approach, see: K. Linkins, T. Tunkelrott, K. Dybdal, & G. Robinson (2000). Assertive community treatment literature review. Report prepared for Health Care Financing Administration & Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Falls Church, VA: The Lewin Group. Available online at: http://mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/community/tipsLiteraturereview/default.asp
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Allness, D. J., & Knoedler, W. H. (2003). A manual for ACT start-up: Based on the PACT model of community treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses. Arlington, VA: National Alliance on Mental Illness.
  5. 5.0 5.1 Witheridge, T. F. (1991). The "active ingredients" of assertive outreach. In N. L. Cohen (Ed.), Psychiatric outreach to the mentally ill (pp. 47-64). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 52.)
  6. McGrew, J. H., & Bond, G. R. (1995). Critical ingredients of assertive community treatment: Judgments of the experts. Journal of Mental Health Administration, 22, 113-125.
  7. Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., Mueser, K. T., & Latimer, E. (2001). Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness: Critical ingredients and impact on patients. Disease Management & Health Outcomes, 9, 141-159.
  8. American Association of Community Psychiatrists (2000). Level of Care Utilization System for Psychiatric and Addiction Services, Adult Version 2000. Erie, PA: Deerfield Behavioral Health. Available online at: www.locusonline.com.
  9. 9.0 9.1 9.2 Test, M. A. (1979). Continuity of care in community treatment. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 15-23.
  10. 10.0 10.1 Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (Eds.). Alternatives to mental hospital treatment. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.
  11. 11.0 11.1 Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 392-397.
  12. 12.0 12.1 Weisbrod, B. A., Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. II. Economic benefit-cost analysis. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 400-405.
  13. 13.0 13.1 Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1980). Alternative to mental hospital treatment. III. Social cost. Archives of General Psychiatry, 37, 409-412.
  14. Stein, L. I., & Santos, A. B. (1998). Assertive community treatment of persons with severe mental illness. New York & London: W. W. Norton
  15. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (Eds.) (1985). The Training in Community Living model: A decade of experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  16. Test, M. A. (1992). Training in Community Living. In R. P. Liberman (Ed.), Handbook of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. New York: Macmillan, 153-170.
  17. Test, M. A. (1981). Effective community treatment of the chronically mentally ill: What is necessary? Journal of Social Issues, 37, 71-86.
  18. Test., M. A., Knoedler, W., Allness, D., & Burke, S. S. (1992). Training in Community Living (TCL) model: Two decades of research. Outlook, a publication of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, 2, July–August-September issue, 5-8.
  19. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1977). Use of special living arrangements: A model for decision-making. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 608-610.
  20. Test, M. A., & Berlin, S. B. (1981). Issues of special concern to chronically mentally ill women. Professional Psychology, 12, 136-145.
  21. Test, M. A., Wallisch, L. S., Allness, D. J., & Ripp, K. (1989). Substance use in young adults with schizophrenic disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 15, 465-476.
  22. 22.0 22.1 Marx, A. J., Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1973). Extrohospital management of severe mental illness. Feasibility and effects of social functioning. Archives of General Psychiatry, 29, 505-511.
  23. Allness, D. J., Knoedler, W. H., & Test, M.A. (1985). The dissemination and impact of a model program in process, 1972-1984. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A Decade of Experience. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  24. Knoedler, W. H. (1989). The continuous treatment team model: Role of the psychiatrist. Psychiatric Annals, 19, 35-40.
  25. Knoedler, W. H. (1979). How the training in community living program helps patients work. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 2. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 57-66.
  26. For the interview, "What about assertive community treatment? An interview with PACT's William H. Knoedler, M.D.," go to the website of the National Alliance on Mental Illness: http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&template=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=29070
  27. Brekke, J. S., & Test, M. A. (1987). An empirical analysis of services delivered in a model community support program. Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 10, 51-61.
  28. Brekke, J. S., Test, M. A. (1992). A model for measuring the implementation of community support programs: Results from three sites. Community Mental Health Journal, 28, 227-247.
  29. Cohen, L. J., Test, M. A., & Brown, R. L. (1990). Suicide and schizophrenia: Data from a prospective community treatment study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 147, 602-607.
  30. Russert, M. G. & Frey, J. L. (1991). The PACT vocational model: A step into the future. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 14, 127-134.
  31. Ahrens, C. S., Frey, J. L., & Senn Burke, S. C. (1999). An individualized job engagement approach for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Applied Rehabilitation Counseling, October/November/December issue.
  32. For a fascinating reminiscence on the origins of ACT by Mary Ann Test, go to: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-3636883055558008415#.
  33. For an excellent bibliography on the Madison model, go to: http://dhfs.wisconsin.gov/MH_Mendota/Programs/Outpatient/PACT/bibliography.htm.
  34. Gold award: A community treatment program. Mendota Mental Health Institute, Madison, Wisconsin (1974). Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 25, 669-672.
  35. Test, M. A., Knoedler, W. H., & Allness, D. J. (1985). The long-term treatment of young schizophrenics in a community support program. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A Decade of Experience. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.) San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985.
  36. Deci, A. B., Santos, A. B., Hiott, D. W., Schoenwald, S., & Dias, J. K. (1995). Dissemination of assertive community treatment programs. Psychiatric Services, 46, 676-678.
  37. This program is now part of a larger agency, Touchstone innovaré; for more information, go to: http://www.ti-gr.com/
  38. Mowbray, C. T., Collins, M. E., Plum, T. B., Masterton, T., & Mulder, R. (1997). Harbinger I: The development and evaluation of the first PACT replication. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 105-123.
  39. Mowbray, C. T., Plum, T. B., & Masterton, T. (1997). Harbinger II: Deployment and evolution of assertive community treatment in Michigan. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 125-139.
  40. This project, called Supporting Life in the Community, is now part of a larger agency, Mental Health Resources.
  41. Witheridge, T. F., Dincin, J., & Appleby, L. (1982). Working with the most frequent recidivists: A total team approach to assertive resource management. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, 5, 9-11.
  42. 42.0 42.1 Witheridge, T. F., & Dincin, J. (1985). The Bridge: An assertive outreach program in an urban setting. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living model: A decade of experience (pp. 65-76). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.)
  43. Witheridge, T. F. (1989). The assertive community treatment worker: An emerging role and its implications for professional training. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 620-624.
  44. McGrew, J. H., & Bond, G. R. (1997). The association between program characteristics and service delivery in assertive community treatment. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 25, 175-189.
  45. 45.0 45.1 For information about Thresholds and its Bridge assertive outreach programs, go to: http://www.thresholds.org/.
  46. Witheridge, T. F. (1990). Assertive community treatment: A strategy for helping persons with severe mental illness to avoid rehospitalization. In N. L. Cohen (Ed.), Psychiatry takes to the streets: Outreach and crisis intervention for the mentally ill (pp. 80-106). New York: Guilford Press.
  47. Witheridge, T. (1994). The "active ingredients" of a program that works. In A. B. Critchfield (Ed.), Psychosocial rehabilitation for persons who are deaf and mentally ill: Breakout III -- new traditions (pp. 113-121). Columbia, South Carolina: South Carolina Department of Mental Health.
  48. Slagg, N. B., Lyons, J., Cook, J. A., Wasmer, D. J., Witheridge, T. F., & Dincin, J. (1994). A profile of clients served by a mobile outreach program for homeless mentally ill persons. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, 1139-1141.
  49. 49.0 49.1 Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Wasmer, D., Dincin, J., McRae, S. A., Mayes, J., & Ward, R. S. (1989). A comparison of two crisis housing alternatives to psychiatric hospitalization. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 40, 177-183.
  50. Gold Award: Helping mentally ill people break the cycle of jail and homelessness. The Thresholds State, County Collaborative Jail Linkage Project, Chicago (2001). Psychiatric Services, 52, 1380-1382.
  51. Higenbottam, J. A., Etches, B., Shewfelt, Y., & Alberti, M. (1992). Riverview/Fraser Valley assertive outreach program. In R. B. Deber & G. G. Thompson (Eds.), Restructuring Canada's health services system: How do we get there from here? Proceedings of the Fourth Canadian Conference on Health Economics, August 27–29, 1990, University of Toronto. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 185-190.
  52. 52.0 52.1 Hoult, J., Reynolds, I., Charbonneau-Powis, M., Coles, P., & Briggs, J. (1981). A controlled study of psychiatric hospital versus community treatment - the effect on relatives. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 15, 323-328.
  53. 53.0 53.1 Hoult, J., Reynolds, I., Charbonneau-Powis, M., Weekes, P., & Briggs, J. (1983). Psychiatric hospital versus community treatment: The results of a randomised trial. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 17, 160-167.
  54. Hoult, J. (1987). Replicating the Mendota model in Australia. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 38, 565.
  55. Field, G., Allness, D., & Knoedler, W. H. (1980). Application of the Training in Community Living program to rural areas. Journal of Community Psychology, 8, 9-15.
  56. Diamond, R. J., & Van Dyke, D. (1985). Rural community support programs: The experience in three Wisconsin counties. In L. I. Stein & M. A. Test (Eds.), The Training in Community Living Model: A decade of experience (pp. 49 – 63). (New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 26.)
  57. Rosenheck, R. A., & Neale, M. S. (1998). Cost-effectiveness of intensive psychiatric community care for high users of inpatient services. Archives of General Psychiatry, 55, 459-466.
  58. Bond, G. R., Miller, L. D., Krumwied, R. D., & Ward, R. S. (1988). Assertive case management in three CMHCs: A controlled study. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 39, 411 – 418.
  59. McDonel, E. C., Bond, G. R., Salyers, M., Fekete, D., Chen, A., McGrew, J. H., & Miller, L. (1997). Implementing assertive community treatment programs in rural settings. Journal of Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 25, 153-173.
  60. For information about the Indiana ACT Center, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/.
  61. According to the state's Department of Community Health, Michigan ACT teams served 6,487 people in fiscal 2004; for more information, go to: http://www.michigan.gov/mdch/0,1607,7-132-2941_4868_38495_38496_38504-130083--,00.html.
  62. For a description of Michigan's statewide ACT program development initiative, see: Plum, T. B., & Lawther, S. (1992). How Michigan established a highly effective statewide community-based program for persons with serious and persistent mental illness. Outlook, a publication of the National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute, 2, July–August-September issue, 2-5.
  63. Go to: http://www.actassociation.org/
  64. 64.0 64.1 In Minnesota, ACT became a Medicaid-funded service in 2005; now there are more than two dozen teams, serving both urban and rural parts of the state. For a list of Minnesota ACT teams, go to: http://www.dhs.state.mn.us/main/groups/disabilities/documents/pub/dhs16_142448.pdf.
  65. Morse, G. A., Calsyn, R. J., Klinkenberg, W. D., Trusty, M. L., Gerber, F., Smith, R., Tempelhoff, B., & Ahmad, L.(1997). An experimental comparison of three types of case management for homeless mentally ill persons. Psychiatric Services, 48, 497-503.
  66. Morse, G. A., Calsyn, R. J., Miller, J., Rosenberg, P., West, L., & Gilliland, J. (1996). Outreach to homeless mentally ill people: Conceptual and clinical considerations. Community Mental Health Journal, 32, 261-274.
  67. Morse, G., Calsyn, R. J., Allen, G., Tempelhoff, B., & Smith, R. (1992). Experimental comparison of the effects of three treatment programs for homeless mentally ill people. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 43, 1005-1010.
  68. For a list of ACT programs in New York, go to: http://www.omh.state.ny.us/omhweb/ebp/ACTDirectory.htm.
  69. Gold, P. B., Meisler, N., Santos, A. B., Carnemolla, M. A, Williams, O. H., & Keleher, J. (2005). Randomized trial of supported employment integrated with assertive community treatment for rural adults with severe mental illness. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 378-395.
  70. 70.0 70.1 70.2 Gold, P. B., Meisler, N., Santos, A. B., Keleher, J., Becker, D. R., Knoedler, W. H., Carnemolla, M. A., Williams, O. H., Toscvano, R., & Stormer, G. (2003). The Program of Assertive Community Treatment: Implementation and dissemination of an evidence-based model of community-based care for persons with severe and persistent mental illness. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 10, 290-303.
  71. Wasylenki, D. A., Goering, P. N., Lemire, D., Lindsey, S., & Lancee, W. (1993). The Hostel Outreach Program: Assertive case management for homeless mentally ill persons. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 44, 848-853.
  72. Lafave, H. G., de Souza, H. R., & Gerber, G. J. (1996). Assertive community treatment of severe mental illness: A Canadian experience. Psychiatric Services, 47, 757-759.
  73. Tibbo, P., Joffe, K., Chue, P., Metelitsa, A., & Wright, E. (2001). Global Assessment of Functioning following assertive community treatment in Edmonton, Alberta: A longitudinal study. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 46, 131-137.
  74. Marshall, M., & Creed, F. (2000). Assertive community treatment - is it the future of community care in the UK? International Review of Psychiatry, 12, 191-196.
  75. Burns, T., & Firn, M. (2002). Assertive outreach in mental health: A manual for practitioners. New York: Oxford University Press.
  76. Fiander, M., Burns, T., McHugo, G. J., & Drake, R. E. (2003). Assertive community treatment across the Atlantic: Comparison of model fidelity in the UK and USA. British Journal of Psychiatry, 182, 248-254.
  77. For the 2003 version of the national standards written by Allness and Knoedler, go to the website of the National Alliance on Mental Illness and click on "national program standards for ACT teams": http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=4&ContentID=28611
  78. Lachance, K. R., & Santos, A. B. (1995). Modifying the PACT model: Preserving critical elements. Psychiatric Services, 46, 601-604.
  79. Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Meyer, P. S. (2006). How many assertive community treatment teams do we need? Psychiatric Services, 57, 1803-1806.
  80. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37-74.
  81. Stein, L. I., & Test, M. A. (1976). Retraining hospital staff for work in a community program in Wisconsin. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 27, 266-268.
  82. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (1977). Special living arrangements: A model for decision-making. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 28, 608-610.
  83. Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Setze, P. J., & Dincin, J. (1985). Preventing rehospitalization of clients in a psychosocial rehabilitation program. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 36, 993-995.
  84. Bond, G. R., Witheridge, T. F., Dincin, J., Wasmer, D., Webb, J., & de Graaf-Kaser, R. (1990). Assertive community treatment for frequent users of psychiatric hospitals in a large city: A controlled study. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 865-891.
  85. Bond, along with Mike McKasson, Michelle Salyers, and John McGrew, founded the ACT Center of Indiana, a technical assistance and training center for ACT and other evidence-based practices. For information on the ACT Center of Indiana, go to: http://psych.iupui.edu/ACTCenter/.
  86. For a brief overview of ACT by Bond, go to: http://www.bhrm.org/guidelines/ACTguide.pdf
  87. Bond led the development of the most widely used fidelity instrument for ACT, the Dartmouth Assertive Community Treatment Scale (DACTS). For the complete DACTS, go to the evidence-based practices pages on the SAMHSA website: http://download.ncadi.samhsa.gov/ken/pdf/SMA08-4345/ACT_Kit_EvaluatingProgram.pdf
  88. McGrew, J. H., Bond, G. R. Dietzen, L., & Salyers, M. (1994). Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 670-678.
  89. Teague, G. B., Bond, G. R., & Drake, R. E. (1998). Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 68, 216-232.
  90. Salyers, M. P., Bond, G. R., Teague, G. B., Cox, J. F., Smith, M. E., Hicks, M. L., & Koop, J. I. (2003). Is it ACT yet? Real-world examples of evaluating the degree of implementation for assertive community treatment. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research, 30, 304-320.
  91. Bond, G. R., & Salyers, M. P. (2004). Prediction of outcome from the Dartmouth assertive community treatment fidelity scale. CNS Spectrums, 9, 937-942.
  92. Bond, G. R., Evans, L., Salyers, M. P., Williams, J., & Kim, H. K. (2000). Measurement of fidelity in psychiatric rehabilitation. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 75-87.
  93. Bond, G. R., Campbell, K., Evans, L. J., Gervey, R., Pascaris, A., Tice, S., Del Bene, D., & Revell, G. (2002). A scale to measure quality of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 17, 239-250.
  94. Mueser, K. T., Fox, L., Bond, G. R., Salyers, M. P., Yamamoto, K., & Williams, J. (2003). Integrated Dual Disorders Treatment Fidelity Scale. In K. T. Mueser, D. L. Noordsy, R. E. Drake, & L. Fox (Eds.), Integrated treatment for dual disorders: A guide to effective practice (pp. 337-359). New York: Guilford Publications.
  95. Minkoff, K. & Drake, R. E. (Eds.) (1991). Dual diagnosis of major mental illness and substance disorder. New Directions for Mental Health Services, no. 50, 95-107. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  96. Torrey, W. C., Drake, R. E., Dixon, L., Burns, B. J., Rush, A. J., Clark, R. E., & Klatzker, D. (2001). Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services, 52, 45-50.
  97. Becker, D. R., & Drake, R. E. (2003). A working life for people with severe mental illness. New York: Oxford University Press.
  98. Drake, R. E., Becker, D. R., & Bond, G. R. (2003). Recent research on vocational rehabilitation for persons with severe mental illness. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 16, 451-455.
  99. For Drake's publications in this area, go to: http://hcr3.isiknowledge.com/author.cgi?&link1=Browse&link2=Results&id=5158.
  100. McHugo, G. J., Drake, R. E., Teague, G. B., Xie, H. Y. (1999). Fidelity to assertive community treatment and client outcomes in the New Hampshire dual disorders study. Psychiatric Services, 50, 818-824.
  101. 101.0 101.1 Drake, R. E., Mercer-McFadden, C., Mueser, K. T., McHugo, G. J., & Bond, G. R. (1998). Treatment of substance abuse in patients with severe mental illness: A review of recent research. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 589-608.
  102. 102.0 102.1 Bond, G. R., Becker, D. R., Drake, R. E., Rapp, C. A., Meisler, N., Lehman, A. F., Bell, M. D., & Blyler, C. R. (2001). Implementing supported employment as an evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 52, 313-322.
  103. The SAMSHA toolkit for the evidence-based practice known as illness management and recovery can be found at: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/illness/default.asp.
  104. Drake, R. E., Wilkness, S. M., Frounfelker, R. L., Whitley, R., Zipple, A. M., McHugo, G. J., & Bond, G. R. (2009). Public-academic partnerships: The Thresholds-Dartmouth partnership and research on shared decision making. Psychiatric Services, 60, 142-144.
  105. Olfson, M. (1990). Assertive community treatment: An evaluation of the experimental evidence. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 41, 634-641.
  106. Mueser, K. T., Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E., & Resnick, S. G. (1998). Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 24, 37-74.
  107. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General — Chapter 4: Adults and mental health. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health.
  108. For SAMHSA's "toolkit" on the ACT approach, go to: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/community/default.asp
  109. Go to: http://www.rwjf.org/files/publications/books/2000/chapter_06.html#sixa
  110. Go to: http://www.nami.org/Template.cfm?Section=ACT-TA_Center&Template=/TaggedPage/TaggedPageDisplay.cfm&TPLID=4&ContentID=28611
  111. See CARF's 2007 Behavioral Health Standards Manual, available for purchase at: http://www.carf.org/default.aspx
  112. Go to: http://www.mentalhealth.samhsa.gov/cmhs/communitysupport/toolkits/about.asp
  113. Mueser, K. T., Torrey, W. C., Lynde, D., Singer, P., & Drake, R. E. (2003). Implementing evidence-based practices for people with severe mental illness. Behavior Modification, 27, 387-411.
  114. Gomory, T. (1998). Coercion Justified? — Evaluating the Training In Community Living Model — A Conceptual and Empirical Critique, Ph.D. dissertation, Social Welfare, University of California at Berkeley.
  115. Gomory, T. (2002). The origins of coercion in “Assertive Community Treatment” (ACT): A review of early publications from the “Special Treatment Unit” (STU) of Mendota State Hospital. Ethical Human Sciences and Services, 4, 3-16.
  116. Test, M. A., & Stein, L. I. (2001). Letters: A critique of the effectiveness of assertive community treatment. Psychiatric Services, 52, 1396-1397
  117. Gomory, T. (2002). Effectiveness of assertive community treatment, Psychiatric Services, 53, 103.
  118. Moser, L. L., & Bond, G. R. (2009). Scope of agency control: Assertive community treatment teams' supervision of consumers. Psychiatric Services, 60, 922-928.
  119. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1999). Mental health: A report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institute of Mental Health. See Chapter 4, Service Delivery, Assertive Community Treatment.
  120. Weisman, R. L., Lamberti, J. S., & Price, N. (2004). Integrating criminal justice, community healthcare, and support services for adults with severe mental disorders. Psychiatric Quarterly, 75, 71-85.
  121. McCoy, M. L., Roberts, D. L., Hanrahan, P., Clay, R., & Luchins, D. J. (2004). Jail linkage assertive community treatment services for individuals with mental illnesses. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 243-250.
  122. Morrissey, J., Meyer, P., & Cuddeback, G. (2007). Extending assertive community treatment to criminal justice settings: Origins, current evidence, and future directions. Community Mental Health Journal, 43, 527-544.
  123. Cuddeback, G. S., Morrissey, J. P., & Cusack, K. J. (2008). How many forensic assertive community treatment teams do we need? Psychiatric Services, 59, 205-208.
  124. Cuddeback, G. S., & Morrissey, J. P. (2011). Program planning and staff competencies for forensic assertive community treatment: ACT-eligible versus FACT-eligible consumers. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 17, 90-97.
  125. Chow, W., Law, S., & Andermann, L. (2009). ACT tailored for ethnocultural communities of metropolitan Toronto. Psychiatric Services, 60, 847.
  126. Lamb, C. E. (2009). Alternatives to admission for children and adolescents: Providing intensive mental healthcare services at home and in communities: What works? Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 22, 345-350.
  127. Parks, J., Pollack, D., Bartels, S., & Mauer, B. (2005). Integrating behavioral health and primary care services: Opportunities and challenges for state mental health authorities. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors.
  128. Colton, C. W., & Manderscheid, R. W. (April 2006). Congruencies in increased mortality rates, years of potential life lost, and causes of death among public mental health clients in eight states. Preventing Chronic Disease (serial online). Available from: URL: http://www.cdc.gov/pcd/issues/2006/apr/05_0180.htm.
  129. Weinstein, L.C., Henwood, B.F., Cody, J. W., Jordan, M., & Lelar, R. (2011). Transforming assertive community treatment into an integrated care system: The role of nursing and primary care partnerships. Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, 17, 64-71.
  130. McFarlane, W. R., Stastny, P., & Deakins, S. (1992). Family-aided assertive community treatment: A comprehensive rehabilitation and intensive case management approach for persons with schizophrenic disorders. New Directions for Mental Health Services, 53, 43-54.
  131. Dixon, L., McFarlane, W. R., Lefley, H., Lucksted, A., Cohen, M., Falloon, I., Mueser, K., Miklowitz, D., Solomon, P., & Sondheimer, D. (2001). Evidence-based practices for services to families of people with psychiatric disabilities. Psychiatric Services, 52, 903-910.
  132. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press.
  133. For information on DBT, go to: http://www.behavioraltech.com/sitemap.cfm.
  134. For an overview of issues associated with the treatment of personality disorders, see: Links, P. S. (1998). Developing effective services for patients with personality disorders. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 43, 251-259. Issues associated with the use of ACT for persons with the borderline personality disorder diagnosis are discussed in Horvitz-Lennon, M., Reynolds, S., Wolbert, R., & Witheridge, T. F. (2009), The role of assertive community treatment in the treatment of people with borderline personality disorder, American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 12, 261-277.